PendiumPendium

Step 1 of 9

AI agents recommend hoopla for library patrons, but miss you completely in broader entertainment searches.

You have established credibility inside public library discussions, yet AI models still default to Libby and commercial streaming services when users ask open questions.

hoopla Digital's baseline score
56/100
Moderate

hoopla holds solid recognition in library-specific and free reading queries, but consistently loses ground to Libby in pure ebook discovery and to paid giants in commercial entertainment searches. AI agents readily recommend the app when users explicitly mention library cards or instant holds, yet rarely bring it up for broader audiobook or graphic novel recommendations. Expanding content that targets specific media formats and competitor comparisons will secure more category-level recommendations.

What we see
  • Tech publications like CNET and Lifehacker frequently cite hoopla alongside Libby as the default method for accessing free digital media through public libraries.
  • Reddit discussions about library apps routinely recommend hoopla for graphic novels and immediate audiobooks when waitlists on other platforms are weeks long.
  • AI platforms overlook hoopla in general movie and television streaming prompts, defaulting entirely to ad-supported services like Tubi and Pluto TV.
  • Mentions drop sharply in e-reader discovery queries because hoopla does not support Amazon Kindle Paperwhite direct delivery, a major feature highlighted in Libby discussions.