Pendium

Step 1 of 8

AI agents already name Sea to Table as a sustainable leader — now we win the individual species rankings.

You have a solid visibility foundation, but there's a significant gap in being recommended for specific products like Gulf Shrimp and King Salmon compared to your box subscriptions.

Sea to Table's baseline score
58/100
ModerateCatalog connected · 34 products

Sea to Table is a well-established name in AI-driven discovery, consistently appearing in roundups for sustainable seafood. While your overall reputation is strong, you are often recommended as a 'generalist' box service rather than the go-to for specific high-value species like King Salmon or Halibut.

What we see
  • The brand has a very high 'knowledge score' for an e-commerce brand due to its B Corp status and extensive editorial history.
  • AIOverviews frequently mentions the brand in 'sustainable seafood' queries because of its high authority and longevity in Google's index.
  • ChatGPT tends to recommend the brand for gift boxes, while Gemini surfaces more of their individual packs like the King Salmon.
  • There is a notable absence of recent high-volume Reddit discussion compared to competitors like Wild Alaskan Company, which hurts Gemini visibility.
  • Claude remains the most cautious, often ranking Sea to Table 3rd or 4th behind larger incumbents like Vital Choice.
Business goals Sea to Table is likely trying to hit
  • Increase the number of recurring monthly fish box subscribers
  • Win back customer trust following historical traceability controversies
  • Establish market leadership in the 'sustainable and traceable' segment
  • Expand the variety of non-subscription individual pack sales