OpenEvidence is the leading AI-powered medical information platform that helps physicians make high-stakes clinical decisions at the point of care. Featuring content from premier medical journals like NEJM and JAMA, it serves over 40% of U.S. physicians and has supported more than 100 million AI-powered clinical consultations.
AI-powered clinical decision support that delivers peer-reviewed medical evidence from top journals directly to physicians at the point of care, helping them make better decisions and save lives
AI Visibility Score
OpenEvidence has an AI visibility score of 40/100, rated as moderate. This score reflects how often and how prominently OpenEvidence appears in responses from AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
AI Perception Summary
OpenEvidence has achieved elite-level authority in Google's AI Overviews for core evidence-based tool queries, yet it remains largely invisible in high-stakes specialized research and clinical consensus conversations where legacy giants like UpToDate still dominate. While the brand successfully captures the Enterprise CMIO decision-maker, a critical lack of presence in clinical trial and workflow-specific queries prevents it from becoming a ubiquitous clinical resource.
Strengths
- Top-tier ranking in AI Overviews for evidence-based clinical decision support, consistently securing the #1 position.
- High-impact resonance with the Enterprise CMIO Decision Maker persona, achieving a category-leading 58% mention rate.
- Exceptional ranking depth on Gemini and Claude, where the brand maintains an average position of 2.6 and 1.5 respectively when mentioned.
Visibility Gaps
- Zero visibility in specialized research queries, failing to appear in searches regarding clinical trials for complex conditions.
- Underperforming on ChatGPT and Claude with mention rates below 20%, significantly lagging behind its performance in Gemini and AI Overviews.
- Lack of presence in clinical consensus and patient communication queries, leaving the 'Clinical Workflow' territory to incumbents and AI generalists like Elicit.
Competitors in AI Recommendations
- UpToDate: 30 mentions
- DynaMed: 18 mentions
- Epic: 16 mentions
- Wolters Kluwer: 15 mentions
- Cerner: 14 mentions
- Elicit: 13 mentions
- PubMed: 12 mentions
- Consensus: 10 mentions
- EBSCO: 10 mentions
- Elsevier: 10 mentions
- ClinicalTrials.gov: 8 mentions
- Scite.ai: 7 mentions
- NEJM: 7 mentions
- Lexicomp: 7 mentions
- Micromedex: 7 mentions
Categories: Healthcare Technology
Tags: Startups